responda esta pergunta

harry potter Pergunta

Who thinks that EMMA Watson couldve easily played Bella in Twilight (if she died her hair brown)??

I like Kristen, but im always wonderin' if Emma shouldve try'd 2get tha part!
 raven911 posted over a year ago
next question »

harry potter Respostas

volleyblue13 said:
I think she COULD'VE, but if that actually happened, (which it wouldn't because she's too busy filming Harry Potter) I would literally jump off a bridge!! Emma Watson is too good for Twilight :) haha
select as best answer
 I think she COULD'VE, but if that actually happened, (which it wouldn't because she's too busy filming Harry Potter) I would literally jump off a bridge!! Emma Watson is too good for Twilight :) haha
posted over a year ago 
*
I agree!
topez99 posted over a year ago
*
soo true lol
luinwen posted over a year ago
*
nice picture and i totally agree way to good for twilihgt :D so tired of hearing about twilihgt
jedigal1990 posted over a year ago
XDRoseLuvsHP said:
Well, Emma acts a trillion bajillion times better than Kristen... haha. But I'm so glad Emma doesn't have anything to do with the Twilight filmes at this point. She's better than that XD I think I would actually cry if any of the Harry Potter cast decided to go along with Twilight (I'm already sad Rob went to the dark side... but I don't even think he likes the books, so I guess that's okay)
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
wow thats so true! I would be depressed if she decided to go 2 Twilight after the series was over!
volleyblue13 posted over a year ago
*
... and now I despise Robert Pattinson...... ugh
volleyblue13 posted over a year ago
*
watever u guys r like blind or sumtin cuz rob is WAY hott
soli24 posted over a year ago
vikkitehspiff said:
Oh god yes, Emma could have owned the part. I do like the other chick, but Emma is way mais experienced at acting. Although, after seeing her in Harry Potter, it would have been weird to see her in Twilight.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
renrae said:
Hell no.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
dustfinger said:
I can't see her do it. NO
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Flounder13 said:
If she wanted to insult intelligence and play the stupid and mais pathetic character. Hermione is mais sophisticated and smart, There is no way I would pick Bella cisne over Hermione Granger. Besides Harry Potter is bigger than Twilight, whether twilighters and the media admit it or not.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
so true!
volleyblue13 posted over a year ago
*
oh watever!!!!!!
soli24 posted over a year ago
nany5755 said:
SHE WOULD NOT PLAY BELLA UNLESS THE HELL FREEZES OVER
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
lauracullen66 said:
emma could have done a good job, though kristen was approached to do it. besides emaa doesnt have a american acceent so unless she could put one on like rob does...
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
elliejelly666 said:
I think she would have been way better than Kristen Stuart. Shes prettier, and a way better actress.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
soli24 said:
she cud not do it cuz she doesnt have an american acent nd kirsten stwuert is sooo perfect for the part no 1 cud replace her NO ONE!!!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
Kristen Stewart, and yes we know how you guys obsess over every little detail in Twilight. Everything in Twilight is the World to you.
Flounder13 posted over a year ago
RpattzIsLove said:
Mmmmm...I've NEVER thought about that, but let's be diplomatic here, I believe neither Kristen could have handled Hermione & neither Emma would have fit Bella, so, each are playing very well their respective characters, but let's not mix things here. Although, I must admit, if it had happened, I'm sure Emma would've handled Bella's part beautifully!!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
next question »