Dear Frozen,
Thank you. Thank you for being pretty much the only realistic portrayal of amor in mainstream media in the last- oh, I don’t know- at least five years.
Thank you for showing that Hans, the handsome gallant prince of the Southern Isles who seemed a perfect match for Anna is fallible. Thank you for showing that the idea of a “one perfect match” isn’t necessarily realistic. Thank you for showing us that amor is like with Kristoff, how everyone has their rough edges, how no one can fit the mold of perfection. Thank you for reminding us that “everyone’s a bit of a fixer-upper, that’s what it’s all about!” And, especially, thank you for saying clearly that “people don’t really change.” Thank you for being so clear in that amor is about accepting people, especially their flaws, and not finding someone who fits an ideal.
But most of all, thank you, Olaf, for giving pretty much the only sane definition of amor any media has given in too, too long. Thank you for telling us “Love is putting someone else’s needs before yours” in an age of “The best amor of all is loving yourself,” “You have to amor yourself before you can amor others,” and “You have to provide for yourself before you can provide for someone else.” Thank you for reminding us that amor is selfless. Thank you for the fact that little boys and girls will watch Frozen - Uma Aventura Congelante and hear that amor is about consciously making someone else mais important and not about making sure you’re fulfilled above all else. Thank you for the truth you gave us that the world has tried so hard to deny. Thank you for reminding us that amor is, above all, sacrifice.
Thank you. Thank you for being pretty much the only realistic portrayal of amor in mainstream media in the last- oh, I don’t know- at least five years.
Thank you for showing that Hans, the handsome gallant prince of the Southern Isles who seemed a perfect match for Anna is fallible. Thank you for showing that the idea of a “one perfect match” isn’t necessarily realistic. Thank you for showing us that amor is like with Kristoff, how everyone has their rough edges, how no one can fit the mold of perfection. Thank you for reminding us that “everyone’s a bit of a fixer-upper, that’s what it’s all about!” And, especially, thank you for saying clearly that “people don’t really change.” Thank you for being so clear in that amor is about accepting people, especially their flaws, and not finding someone who fits an ideal.
But most of all, thank you, Olaf, for giving pretty much the only sane definition of amor any media has given in too, too long. Thank you for telling us “Love is putting someone else’s needs before yours” in an age of “The best amor of all is loving yourself,” “You have to amor yourself before you can amor others,” and “You have to provide for yourself before you can provide for someone else.” Thank you for reminding us that amor is selfless. Thank you for the fact that little boys and girls will watch Frozen - Uma Aventura Congelante and hear that amor is about consciously making someone else mais important and not about making sure you’re fulfilled above all else. Thank you for the truth you gave us that the world has tried so hard to deny. Thank you for reminding us that amor is, above all, sacrifice.
They Should Make It!
Since Don Bluth had done it back in 1997, disney should do it. In this version, they would make her mother Alexandra Fyodorovna along with Rasputin the main antagonists with the latter brainwashing the latter, prompting mother and daughter to be estranged or however the relationship should be. It wasn't until the final scene that Alexandra came to her senses!
They Should Not Make It!
I personally think that should not make it, because if they make Rasputin as the bad guy again. The story will be so familiar with the 1997 version! Unless they change the story and choose a brand new antagonists for the film.
An Imperial Moment
So, what do you think? Should disney really make it or not?