|
Cinders said:
They're arbitrary. They aren't bad, and they aren't law, they're dictated por culture, one hundred percent. In matriarchal cultures, women held the power. Some even fought as soldiers. But the matriarchal cultures, ironically, were mais focused on, well, mais cultural and internal pursuits. The patriarchal cultures were mais warring... and they invaded many of the matriarchal cultures. Which is why that's the way in most places today. But gender roles are entirely dictated por the culture in which you're born. There's nothing wrong with that, but it does amuse me when someone tries to link it to science or biology - it's neither, it's sociology. Anthropology. That's all. And then there's this: "In every known human society, the male’s need for achievement can be recognized. Men may cook, or weave or dress bonecas or hunt hummingbirds, but if such activities are appropriate occupations of men, then the whole society, men and women alike, views them as important. When the same occupations are performed por women, they are regarded as less important. In a great number of human societies men’s sureness of their sex role is tied up with their right, or ability, to practice some activity that women are not allowed to practice. Their maleness, in fact, has to be underwritten por preventing women from entering some field or performing some feat." - Margaret Mead, a brilliant (female!) anthropologist.
|
|