WARNING: I have not watched everything as I am kinda just in a hurry. So it's quite possible this review is generally biased atm.
But for now I'll just post some quick thoughts.
The animation is the worst thing I've ever seen in all of the series: The movement is choppy, and very repeating in some parts. The part where the lobo howled just showed how lazy they have became.
Now the whole movie so far feels like a misleading title.
The only parts I've seen that were good was the creativity (I don't think calling it a rip-off would be fair as that's like calling every movie a rip-off), and the dancing and the joy Humphrey has (I could be wrong as I didn't watch it), the new unique designs of the bears, and some interesting music.
As much as I defend direct creativity (ideas alone and showing ideas), it still doesn't change that there is lack of effort such as choppy animation, bad lighting, low-polygon modelos a lot, and other legit lazy things.
Yet, even though it's an effort alone, why make a movie about anthropomorphic lobos when half of it isn't about anthropomorphic wolves? The only time I would call out an effort is if it makes the whole effort (e.g. title) bad and this is one of them.
Of course, I am not a bad critic who stifles creativity and likes to be an asshole to the creator (I want to be a sane fan), and if they wanted to make a pixar quality film with only the cachorrinhos growing up, I can't call it out even if I hate it, I still want to say that the movie has a lot of problems.
---
Pros:
Creativity
Music
Anthropomorphic personality adding personality to the characters.
May be enjoyable to kids
Cons:
Bad animation; choppy and it repeats a lot.
Misleading movie title.
nintendo 64 Models.
Bad lighting.
cachorrinhos still looking like cachorrinhos within a universe where the lobos do grow in months.
Remember, this review is based off what I've seen so far.
Tom Kane, I respect your attempt at making what you want in a fictional film, but I hope you also improve if you plan on making anything in the future with Alpha and Omega.
But for now I'll just post some quick thoughts.
The animation is the worst thing I've ever seen in all of the series: The movement is choppy, and very repeating in some parts. The part where the lobo howled just showed how lazy they have became.
Now the whole movie so far feels like a misleading title.
The only parts I've seen that were good was the creativity (I don't think calling it a rip-off would be fair as that's like calling every movie a rip-off), and the dancing and the joy Humphrey has (I could be wrong as I didn't watch it), the new unique designs of the bears, and some interesting music.
As much as I defend direct creativity (ideas alone and showing ideas), it still doesn't change that there is lack of effort such as choppy animation, bad lighting, low-polygon modelos a lot, and other legit lazy things.
Yet, even though it's an effort alone, why make a movie about anthropomorphic lobos when half of it isn't about anthropomorphic wolves? The only time I would call out an effort is if it makes the whole effort (e.g. title) bad and this is one of them.
Of course, I am not a bad critic who stifles creativity and likes to be an asshole to the creator (I want to be a sane fan), and if they wanted to make a pixar quality film with only the cachorrinhos growing up, I can't call it out even if I hate it, I still want to say that the movie has a lot of problems.
---
Pros:
Creativity
Music
Anthropomorphic personality adding personality to the characters.
May be enjoyable to kids
Cons:
Bad animation; choppy and it repeats a lot.
Misleading movie title.
nintendo 64 Models.
Bad lighting.
cachorrinhos still looking like cachorrinhos within a universe where the lobos do grow in months.
Remember, this review is based off what I've seen so far.
Tom Kane, I respect your attempt at making what you want in a fictional film, but I hope you also improve if you plan on making anything in the future with Alpha and Omega.
