responda esta pergunta

once upon a time Pergunta

Does anyone else think that the heart-crushing deaths are inconsistent?

Daniel died almost instantly after having his coração ripped out. However, I will state that it was probably because Cora crushed the coração almost immediately. After Milah's coração was torn out, she felt to the ground and was clearly dying even before Rumple crushed the heart. Old Henry died immediately after the removal of his coração even though it was still in one piece! Graham on the other hand managed to live for twenty-eight plus years without his heart...and he probably would have lived for much longer if Regina hadn't crushed it.

Has anyone else noticed this inconsistency between those you have died from having their hearts ripped out/crushed?
 afirewiel posted over a year ago
next question »

once upon a time Respostas

zanhar1 said:
I noticed that kind of dives me nuts.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
beekee404 said:
maybe it depends on how they do it. maybe there's a certain way they take out the heart. maybe in graham's case, regina cursed the coração to make it so that he still lives without it and will only die when its crushed. thats just my theory
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
BubblesVGS said:
So glad im not the only one who notices that.... Its so annoying!!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
LowriLorenza89 said:
I think the initial reaction is supposed to be due to shock and physical pain, and possibly also fear because they're guessing that their coração is about to be crushed. If they're given enough time before the coração is then crushed, they recover. If the coração is crushed quite quickly after removal, this initial reaction morphs into the actual death. If it isn't, they can recover.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
next question »