1. Some mais minor characters, such as Dobby, were only included in the films where their roles were pivotal. Others such as Peeves were excluded entirely. The development of minor relationships such as Tonks/Lupin and Bill/Fleur was cut.
2. The locations for Harry/Ginny and Ron/Hermione's first kisses were both altered in the films. Some smaller scenes between the couples were also changed or added in. Scenes such as Harry and Hermione dancing in Deathly Hallows were added to please their fãs and to create mais of an impression of a amor triangle.
3. Some characters' appearances didn't fully match their descriptions in the books. Harry didn't have green eyes since Daniel Radcliffe was unable to wear coloured contact lenses. Lily didn't have the same eye colour as him either. Hermione didn't have bushy hair and buck teeth as described in the books.
4. Only Quidditch games where a significant event occurred were shown in the films. Gryffindor were not shown winning the Cup in the third film.
5. The scene of Dumbledore beginning to prepare the fight against Voldemort at the end of Goblet of fogo was omitted. He wasn't shown asking Snape to return to his spy-work, asking Sirius to contact old Order members or asking Hagrid and Madame Maxime to contact the giants.
6. The battle at the end of Half-Blood Prince was omitted too. Instead, there was an attack on the Burrow earlier in the film.
7. The majority of the memories showing Voldemort's past were omitted. As a result, it wasn't clear how Dumbledore and Harry knew what objects could be Horcruxes or where they could be hidden.
8. During his final confrontation with Voldemort, Harry didn't explain how he had become the true master of the Deathly Hallows. Neither did he explain the truth about Snape's motivations and allegiance.
9. The scene of Neville killing Nagini was moved to coincide with Voldemort and Harry's confrontation, instead of occurring shortly beforehand as in the book.
10. Both Bellatrix and Voldemort were given dramatic death scenes, with their bodies crumpling and dissolving into nothingness, instead of simply dying normally as in the book.
2. The locations for Harry/Ginny and Ron/Hermione's first kisses were both altered in the films. Some smaller scenes between the couples were also changed or added in. Scenes such as Harry and Hermione dancing in Deathly Hallows were added to please their fãs and to create mais of an impression of a amor triangle.
3. Some characters' appearances didn't fully match their descriptions in the books. Harry didn't have green eyes since Daniel Radcliffe was unable to wear coloured contact lenses. Lily didn't have the same eye colour as him either. Hermione didn't have bushy hair and buck teeth as described in the books.
4. Only Quidditch games where a significant event occurred were shown in the films. Gryffindor were not shown winning the Cup in the third film.
5. The scene of Dumbledore beginning to prepare the fight against Voldemort at the end of Goblet of fogo was omitted. He wasn't shown asking Snape to return to his spy-work, asking Sirius to contact old Order members or asking Hagrid and Madame Maxime to contact the giants.
6. The battle at the end of Half-Blood Prince was omitted too. Instead, there was an attack on the Burrow earlier in the film.
7. The majority of the memories showing Voldemort's past were omitted. As a result, it wasn't clear how Dumbledore and Harry knew what objects could be Horcruxes or where they could be hidden.
8. During his final confrontation with Voldemort, Harry didn't explain how he had become the true master of the Deathly Hallows. Neither did he explain the truth about Snape's motivations and allegiance.
9. The scene of Neville killing Nagini was moved to coincide with Voldemort and Harry's confrontation, instead of occurring shortly beforehand as in the book.
10. Both Bellatrix and Voldemort were given dramatic death scenes, with their bodies crumpling and dissolving into nothingness, instead of simply dying normally as in the book.
*Diagon Alley is a cobbled wizarding rua and shopping area located in Londres behind a pub called the Leaky Cauldron. Many of the set pieces were re-dressed and repurposed as Hogsmeade for Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban.
*To create the magical moment when Harry's wand chooses him in Ollivanders, filmmakers slowed the film speed, which is normally twenty-four frames per second, to one hundred and twenty frames per second.Remarkably, this dilation of time, some clever lighting, a smoke machine, and a fã were all they needed to produce this effect.
*To create the magical moment when Harry's wand chooses him in Ollivanders, filmmakers slowed the film speed, which is normally twenty-four frames per second, to one hundred and twenty frames per second.Remarkably, this dilation of time, some clever lighting, a smoke machine, and a fã were all they needed to produce this effect.
I recently found a strange contradiction in the concept of wizarding money.I'd like to know if my idea is true or if there is a counter-argument against it.
In pg.65 of HP and the Chamber of Secrets,we learn that Muggle money can be exchanged into wizarding money.
We also know that potentially valuable(in a Muggle point of view) objects such as chairs can be Conjured por magic(eg:Dumbledore does this in the courtroom in HP and The Order of the Phoenix).
So any wizard who knows basic Transfiguration can Conjure objects such as chairs,sell them to Muggles to obtain Muggle money and then exchange this money into Galleons,thus obtaining an infinite amount of wealth.
Doesn't this contradict the whole point of wizarding money?
Thanks in advance for any help.
In pg.65 of HP and the Chamber of Secrets,we learn that Muggle money can be exchanged into wizarding money.
We also know that potentially valuable(in a Muggle point of view) objects such as chairs can be Conjured por magic(eg:Dumbledore does this in the courtroom in HP and The Order of the Phoenix).
So any wizard who knows basic Transfiguration can Conjure objects such as chairs,sell them to Muggles to obtain Muggle money and then exchange this money into Galleons,thus obtaining an infinite amount of wealth.
Doesn't this contradict the whole point of wizarding money?
Thanks in advance for any help.
