Why do critics give this Movie a hard time? it has been given 2 starts out of 5

Obviously a lot of them are assholes that judge filmes por glitches

maybe because children like it but movie critics dont, because they actually judge a movie

Becuase there is nothing true about lobos in it. Sense when is half a pack Alphas and the other Omegas? Its one of the many reason I hate this movie. 7Wolf species are extinct, 3Endangered and the movie people decided to give lobos an even mais bad reputation with false information. How many of you guys know that defenseless pregent lobos in their dens shall be hunted this year:?

people have no taste! i would give this a million stars!

if i were a critic i would have given 4.5 out of 5.it was awesome but could have added a few mais parts

you see movie critics are old and senile so they would not know anything good even if they made it them selfs

critics these days hav no idea wat they r doing most filmes in the last 3 years hav been given a rating tht is either to high or to low

There are a few reasons depending on the critic in question. The most common reason is that critics today like to judge everything based on something else they may have watched. Speaking in terms of most critics, you sit around all dia doing little mais than watching movies, you get too used to it. Things get old, you don't like anything anymore, so your ratings start to fall. Happens to all of them.
Another reason is because some critics feel that the movie is too "adult" for kids. There is a good deal of sexual innuendo, adult humor and things of that sort in the movie. However, that is why it was rated PG instead of G so any rating based on that is unfair.
If you look at Yahoo, most people who actually watched the movie gave it A ratings, while critics trashed it. I prefer to think that people who actually watched the movie because they wanted too are better judges of how good it was.
Me? I think it was awesome, which is why I am here.

cause they have no lives