*walks in* -0.4 segundos later- *immediately walks out* Posted over a year ago

Weird, I thought I posted a comment on that rumor post where there might be a chance of Alpha and Omega 9 happening, but it's removed? Or for some reason it didn't post. If anyone saw my comment there, I don't mind knowing. XD Posted over a year ago

Heads up folks, that "Press Release" has a lot of spelling issues. For example, "Alpha And Omega", "Tropical vacation", "BLU_RAY", (Is it normal for shift to be hold down for "-" when intentionally capitalizing the word "Blu-ray"?), "Into" in one part is capitalize in a title.

Either a person making this up isn't very good at grammar. Or it's real and the official writers are not good at grammar. XD Posted over a year ago

disney made Copyright too long, disney tried to prevent Winnie the Pooh grave, and recently disney denies a final wish from a dying little kid to have a disney character on their grave. It might be seguro to say that disney is officially the WORST popular company in the entire world. Posted over a year ago

E3 is almost here... Whoooo. >_> Posted over a year ago

Now in terms of critique, a legal art style is not flawed, but on a personal level when I saw Sonic's design in the movie it didn't look THAT bad, but the mais I look at the face with the teeth, I am a bit mais uncomfortable. XD Posted over a year ago

Weird, someone flagged a couple of my artigos as "broken content". One of them was "Human Phrases May Be Realistic". Posted over a year ago

Honestly Alpha and Omega 1 should of been mais magical, kinda like an average RPG where there is magic. Yeah I'm not kidding, I just think fantasia does nothing but embrace mais possibilities and makes the lobos mais likable.The idea of "realism" even if the lobos are anthropomorphic sounds predictable and boring. XD Believe it or not, even I wasn't a huge fã of the plot in the first movie mainly (not that I'm judging it on itself). Posted over a year ago

Imagine having your favorito legal TV show pulled because the person who made it has committed something serious, or was alleged to even though the art has nothing to do with it. Just imagine, good art censored/book burned because of some people not realizing the difference between art, and unrelated mistakes done por the same creator. - Following the Michael Jackson Simpsons episode incident. Posted over a year ago

Looking at some of the comments, I think maybe I can say that some people aren't atuação better. We have one person personally attacking someone for a vore picture, and, well some other stuff. If you don't want this person atuação like this, then honestly I ask some other people to do the same thing. It's hypocritical.
There I said it. -_- Posted over a year ago