responda esta pergunta

true blood Pergunta

When Eric silvercuffed himself to Russell por daylight, wasn't Russell supposed to burn faster?

I mean, in season 2, Godric told Sookie before dying that, since he was old, he was going to burn very fast and he was right. But Russell, being like 1000 years older than Godric did not burn fast even if he was out por daylight during a much longer time than Godric. I understand he drank Sookie's blood but isn't he supposed to burn faster than Eric (which didn't seem to be the case) even if Eric was out por daylight before him (considering Eric is younger than him)?
 Mrs-X posted over a year ago
next question »

true blood Respostas

Azoe said:
No, I dont think so.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
I mean... Maybe your right. Lol, Idk :)
Azoe posted over a year ago
*
lol oh kay ^^
Mrs-X posted over a year ago
trueblood17 said:
haha yeah that's true
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
ChavaTzeit said:
You're right! I asked myself the same question: Why did Godric die in a lovely green light and disappeared altogether without appearing to suffer while Russel burnt like a toast. Just a mistake por the writers of the show I guess.
select as best answer
 You're right! I asked myself the same question: Why did Godric die in a lovely green light and disappeared altogether without appearing to suffer while Russel burnt like a toast. Just a mistake por the writers of the show I guess.
posted over a year ago 
Sam192013 said:
I ask myself that same pergunta every time I watch that episode. From what I understand the older you are the faster you burn, I understand that Sookie's blood may be strong but he should have been burning at least as fast as Eric because Eric is 2000 years younger than him and he had already been out there longer.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
next question »