Fallout 3 Club
cadastrar-se
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
 Fallout 3!
added by
Source: Me
Fallout 3
fotografia
fallout 3
so perfect
awesome
game
2008 game
rules
Fanpup says...

This Fallout 3 fotografia contains atirador. There might also be rua, cena da cidade, ajuste urbano, cenário urbano, cena de rua, cidade, urbana definindo, alpinista, alpinist, boina verde, forças especiais, soldado de elite, soldado de elite de boina verde, and forças especiais.

video
fallout 3
awesome
need
rocks
fallout 3 kinda movie
be
to
added by vagos
added by vagos
Source: Me
added by vagos
posted by vagos
Ok. Let me get this straight. Some idiots built a town around an undetonated nuke. Some guy wants you to detonate the nuke because it's a "blight on the urban landscape". Looks like the fact that a nuclear explosion would wipe out and contaminate that very landscape doesn't occur to him. Then again, in this setting people use nuclear explosions to light up cigars, so maybe it's not that bad. A well designed quest!

Anyway, did you notice that the artigo does not mention any option to do something differently? One would think that Todd would have illustrated or at least mentioned all the options...
continue reading...
added by vagos
added by vagos
added by vagos
added by PandoriumPanda
added by vagos
added by vagos
posted by vagos
Leonard Boyarsky, one of the creators of the original Fallout, when asked about Interplay's sale of the rights to Bethesda, said that he felt as though "our ex-wife had sold our children that she had legal custody of," admitting that he feels very possessive of the series,[8] but also admitted that his concerns have nothing to do with Bethesda.[9] Considerable concern was also raised por some members of the series' fã community, largely concerning major changes in game play style compared to the original games and Fallout 3's similarity to Oblivion. The reaction from the press, however, was...
continue reading...
On July 4, 2008, Fallout 3 was refused classification por the OFLC in Australia, thus making the game illegal for sale in the country. In order for the game to be reclassified, the offending content in the Australian version of the game would have to be removed por Bethesda Softworks and the game resubmitted to the OFLC.[16] According the OFLC board report, the game was refused classification due to the "realistic visual representations of drugs and their delivery method (bringing) the 'science-fiction' drugs in line with 'real-world' drugs." Despite this, Australia's Fallout 3 was expected to...
continue reading...
posted by vagos
Fallout 3 was initially under development por Black Isle Studios, a studio owned por Interplay Entertainment, under the working título furgão, van Buren. Interplay Entertainment closed down Black Isle Studios before the game could be completed, and the license to develop Fallout 3 was sold for a $1,175,000 minimum guaranteed advance against royalties to Bethesda Softworks, a studio primarily known as the developer of the The Elder Scrolls series.[3] Bethesda's Fallout 3 however, was developed from scratch, using neither furgão, van Buren code, nor any other materials created por Black Isle Studios. In May 2007, a playable technology demo of the canceled project was released to the public.[4]
While Fallout and Fallout 2 feature turn-based combat and top-down isometric view in a 2-D engine, Fallout 3 features real-time combat and first or third person view in a 3-D engine. Fallout Tactics and the canceled furgão, van Buren featured both turn-based and real-time combat and a top-down view.
Perks and Traits have been merged. In Fallout and Fallout 2, Traits were chosen at character creation, and were commonly a combination of a powerful advantage and a potent disadvantage, where Perks were purely advantageous.
In the SPECIAL character system, the number of skills has been reduced from 18 to 13, traits have been removed and perks are selected every level instead of every 3 to 4 levels.
posted by vagos
The Karma system is an important feature in Fallout's gameplay. A player's actions, including conversation and combat choices, affects the player's status in the game world; a player who makes good decisions is received mais positively por non-player characters, and a player that makes bad decisions has the opposite reaction. Crimes can also be committed por a player, and whichever faction or group that is harmed por a crime are fully aware of the player's action in most cases. Other factions that were not affected por the crime will not be aware of it, and since a town is usually its own faction,...
continue reading...
posted by vagos
Not actually a fat man, which would in its own way be hilarious, the Fat Man is a "shoulder-mounted tactical nuclear catapult." In layman's terms, that means it's a hand held weapon that basically shoots nuclear bombs at people. It should certainly incinerate your target, but do be warned, there's a high possibility it will also incinerate everything around it (including your mates and possibly yourself), as well as leaving residual radiation.

The name comes from the segundo atomic bomb that was dropped on Japão in 1945. Unsurprisingly, in the game's Japanese release, this had to be changed, with the Fat Man becoming the Nuka Launcher in the Land of the Rising Sun. In Japan, the side quest whereby you can choose to detonate the atomic bomb in the town of Megaton was also removed from the game.
The case of Broken Steel, however, seems to be an exception to the rule. Aside perhaps from Mass Effect 2's Arrival – whose effects on your Mass Effect 3 playthrough are yet to be revealed – never have I found DLC that is fundamental to my understanding of a game's overarching story. And that's got to be a good thing.

Of course, not every single game out there is long enough to justify premium post-release content. If a developer releases DLC on topo, início of a game that's just way too short, I feel like I'm being ripped off, because why couldn't this content have been included in the main release?...
continue reading...
"It's not an action game. It's a role-playing game.", Todd Howard


Todd Howard seems to think so, but then again, Todd seems to think a lot of things. Some of them may even be true. Leaving the obvious pergunta "why did the magazine file Fallout 3 under "action RPG"?" aside, let's take a look at what the presentation of this role-playing game was focused on. For example, how many dialogue screens were shown in those 10 pages? Zero. Wouldn't you think that dialogues are an important Fallout element that the presentation should have mentioned, if not focused on? Apparently not. How many quests were explained in details, showing the design and them moral, game-changing choices? Once again, Bethesda follows the Oblivion formula: focus on the visuals and HAWT AKSHUN, assure people that quests and dialogues are superb and awesome in seven different ways, but show nothing to back up these claims.
added by vagos